<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Classify what? Trademark who?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenotsolegalshow.com/2008/05/15/classify-what-trademark-who/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenotsolegalshow.com/2008/05/15/classify-what-trademark-who/</link>
	<description>Let&#039;s make the law entertaining, shall we?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 00:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Moore</title>
		<link>http://thenotsolegalshow.com/2008/05/15/classify-what-trademark-who/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shannon Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenotsolegalshow.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Stephanie,

Great post about International Classifications! This is definitely a subject that&#039;s confusing to those just diving into the trademark pool &amp; I think you explained it very well.

I was especially intrigued by your promise of a post about trying to classify something that&#039;s seemingly unclassifiable. This comes up so often when dealing with folks who are either in a niche market or those who are dealing with new technology. It&#039;s all the USPTO can do to catch up, never mind be on point with burgeoning technology.

For instance, podcast was first used in 2004 but the term didn&#039;t make it into the USPTO Goods &amp; Services manual until November 30, 2006 &amp; expanded further on July 12, 2007.

Again, great post &amp; I look forward to reading more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephanie,</p>
<p>Great post about International Classifications! This is definitely a subject that&#8217;s confusing to those just diving into the trademark pool &amp; I think you explained it very well.</p>
<p>I was especially intrigued by your promise of a post about trying to classify something that&#8217;s seemingly unclassifiable. This comes up so often when dealing with folks who are either in a niche market or those who are dealing with new technology. It&#8217;s all the USPTO can do to catch up, never mind be on point with burgeoning technology.</p>
<p>For instance, podcast was first used in 2004 but the term didn&#8217;t make it into the USPTO Goods &amp; Services manual until November 30, 2006 &amp; expanded further on July 12, 2007.</p>
<p>Again, great post &amp; I look forward to reading more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

