Category Archives: lawsuit

Fat Tire

No, I am not talking about the beer. Les Schwab Tire Centers is paying 2 million dollars to those involved in the gender discrimination class action lawsuit filed against the tire store. In a nutshell, apparently there are a lot of women out there who are dying to change a tire and Les Schwab, a tire store I have never heard of, apparently doesn’t think women are fit to change a tire.

Now, while I applaud the woman who stood up for themselves, I am just curious how many women out there have found themselves wanting to actually work at a tire store. It is interesting that some plaintiff’s attorney found a way to find the right people to get this lawsuit filed and god only knows how long the whole process took. In any event, it is good to know the doors have been opened for all of those tire changers out there.


El Diablo update

The name change for Mt. Diablo is being contested in every which way.  I promised I would give an update so now you have it!

(Stephanie Cohen was here)


Phil Spector has funny hair

I have to admit that I was a little surprised at the headlines that Phil Spector was found guilty. Not because I don’t think he is guilty but more because I thought the jury would have a hard time actually convicting the guy.  When I was in law school, I did this project where I compared movies that have juries in them to the real world of a jury.  Of course, what I found was that often a jury isn’t portrayed exactly correct in entertainment. So, what do you do when the guy you have to convict kind of is entertainment in his own right? I mean, can you imagine sitting on the jury and looking at Phil Spector all day? I can only imagine what it was like for the jurors.

I have written about this before but I think it is really tough to decide someone’s fate. I am sure it was tough for these jurors as well but I think the security guard who heard Phil say “I think I just killed someone” probably is what did it. I feel sorry for the woman who went to his house. I wonder if she knew what she was in for by going over there. I doubt it.


Blondes don’t always have more fun

So this is a good one. Charlotte Feeney of Stratford brought a claim against L’Oreal claiming that she tried to dye her hair blond but the dye turned her hair brown so of course, L’Oreal should pay for this traumatic situation.  Ms. Feeney claimed this situation has led to her ultimate demise as her social life has been ruined, she doesn’t get as much attention anymore and she was forced to go on anti-depressants because she was so traumatized by the fact that she couldn’t return to her natural blonde hue. Um, hate to say it but for any woman out there that has had her hair colored, we all know that you absolutely can get your hair back to its natural color. It might take awhile but maybe Ms. Feeney doesn’t have any friends that could tell her that.

The judge dismissed the suit saying that Ms. Feeney never actually proved that L’Oreal had made an error by saying that the dye was for blond hair when in fact it was for brown hair.

This is one of those cases where you wonder if Ms. Feeney maybe had a good friend that would have told her this lawsuit was ridiculous as apparently her lawyer never did. It kind of makes you feel like you could bring a lawsuit for anything these days and even your lawyer won’t stop you. I love hearing about cases like these though as it’s kind of fun to see what people out there really try to get away with these days. At least the judge wouldn’t have any of it.


Puttar, Potter, can’t we all just be friends?

So, I have to admit, I am not exactly a Harry Potter fan. I know, hard to believe but it’s just not happening. I don’t wait in line for the books and I think I saw one of the movies but that is about it. However, I thought this was a quite interesting story. Has anyone ever heard of Hari Puttar?

I have never heard of it (although it is conjuring up some odd images) either but apparently it is a movie that is going to be released in India. It has sort of that “Home Alone” feel where a 10 year old Indian boy and his cousin were left at home while his parents go on vacation or something to that affect. Of course, who do you think stepped in claiming the movie title was too close to home? The Harry Potter folks of course but the court ruled that for anyone who knows the Harry Potter books, this movie would not be confusing nor would it make people think that Hari Puttar is just Harry Potter misspelled. Ok, so I added that last comment in but basically in a case like this, you are looking for the likelihood of confusion. Would someone look at one product and think they are getting something else? In this case, apparently not and I have to say I agree.

I might have thought for one second that Hari Puttar sounded similar but that really is all that I think would happen. I doubt someone would buy a ticket to the movie, sit down and then when the movie started think to themselves, what?? Where are the talking brooms and wizards? (there are talking brooms and wizards in Harry Potter – right?)

Hari Puttar on Netflix anyone?


C-H-E-A-T. Wait, that’s not the answer

I am not a cheater. But, technically what does that mean. Does that mean that it is not cheating if I stop doing yoga while everyone is still in their pose trying oh so hard to be a yoga god? Does it mean that I am not cheating when I perhaps run a red light simply because it was yellow long enough that I thought I could make it?

At Trabuco Hills High School in Mission Viejo, 385 students took their AP tests. However, due to various reasons, students were able to text, talk and even consult study aids during the tests. For that reason, the testing company voided all of the scores and an attorney has filed a lawsuit against the testing company on behalf of the “non-cheating” students.

There is actually something quite pleasant about this lawsuit. The kids they have interviewed have actually said “some of us don’t cheat” and are quite bummed that now they have to re-take the tests. I couldn’t agree more. The testing company did not do much of an investigation and rather just voided the tests altogether. It is not saying too much of our students these days if they just assume everyone was cheating. I am not sure what results an investigation would turn out but it is nice to know that there are students actually mad about this. It is sad that the group of cheaters had to ruin it for the rest.

I will be curious to see what the outcome of this lawsuit is as it is difficult to predict the damages. I don’t know if the attorney is just asking for the results to be re-instated and the students perhaps compensated for their time but I do believe the damages caused will be an issue. It is likely the case will settle regardless but at least this is a case where people are trying to say they should not have to be punished for the cheating habits of others.

Fine, fine, yoga is not a good comparison of cheating here but it was all I could think of at the moment! Here is to all of the non-cheaters out there!


Defend what?

I felt the need to address this subject as it seems to be coming up lately. I keep meeting criminal defense attorneys. I am not sure why but it seems to keep happening. I always remember this time in law school when we were studying a case about the “felony murder rule”. Now, the felony murder rule basically steps up a crime to murder if a person dies while a felony is being committed and the defendant is now guilty (allegedly of course) of the murder as well regardless of whether they meant for the person to die or not. (ie: A person wants to rob a store and that is their only intent. Instead, they rob a store and then shoot the store owner. The felony murder rule would be applied.) There are lengthy conversations to be had about the felony murder rule. However,  back to my criminal law class. When we were studying this particular case surrounding the felony murder rule, the issue that a murder was actually committed didn’t seem to matter. Rather, the focus was whether the felony itself was being committed.

For me, I kept wanting to say but wait a minute, a murder happened. Can’t we focus on that for a second. It seemed as if everyone in my class sort of glossed over the idea and they were more interested in hashing out the facts over whether a felony was actually committed. It just seemed so strange. As if everyone was looking at this situation in such a practical way that the murder part sort of passed them by.

When I ask defense attorneys if they like what they do, they always say yes because it gives them a chance to make sure the person is getting a fair shot. I used to always say — but, what if you KNOW the person committed the crime? The general response is always how that is not their job to say but their job is to make sure the person is given their rights just like everyone else. I used to always take such offense to that. I used to think that I could never understand how someone could sit in the same room with a person that they know killed someone but yet fight so hard to make sure their rights are protected.

I know it is a job I could never do but I do have some comfort in knowing that there are people out there making sure others have their rights protected. I am going to interview a defense attorney so this issue should only get more interesting. More to come.  


Getting evicted

If you get a notice on your apartment door saying “the eviction process has begun” but there isn’t an actual eviction notice, do you have to move out? As a tenant, you should always be aware of your rights. I will focus on California but each state should have a Department of Housing of some sort or a legal aid organization that can help you with your tenant rights.

In California, a landlord can give a 3 day, 30 day or 60 day notice to a tenant who is in breach of their obligations and rules as a tenant bound to a lease agreement. However, in order to evict a tenant, an unlawful detainer lawsuit must be filed. So, let’s say the first part of this process is receiving proper notice. One argument to make is that if your landlord tells you they are beginning the eviction process but you don’t receive any other type of notice, technically you could try to say that your landlord is giving you 30 days to move out and if you don’t move out, only then can they properly evict you. Most people would think getting evicted is an ordeal but again, I am all for making your life easier. If you hate your landlord and are getting in constant fights, you might as well move out and call it a day.

What happens when you can’t get your landlord to speak to you? FIND THE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY.  I have heard many stories where the landlord lives in the building but won’t speak to the tenant and the tenant thinks the “landlord” is the only person that they need to contact. You need to go above the landlord. Sometimes speaking with anyone but your landlord is the best idea. The property management company is the best way to go. 

Two helpful sites to check out are: http://www.hud.gov/local/ca/renting/tenantrights.cfm and

http://www.dca.ca.gov/publications/landlordbook/index.shtml

Sometimes landlords like to take advantage of their tenants, don’t let it happen to you. Or better yet, if you have a landlord “situation”, I would start looking for a new place to live.


Victoria’s Secret…watch out for the wrath of the thong?

As someone who likes to buy lingerie, when I saw the headlines about Victoria’s Secret and some type of lawsuit, I figured I should check it out. In an adventure of her own, 52 year old Macrida Patterson damaged her cornea when a piece of metal holding some type of rhinestone on her thong underwear flew into her eye after she was trying to put it on.

http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSKUA04469620080620

A products liability lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles and certainly this sounds ridiculous. 1.) What are the chances that a piece of metal would fly off of a piece of thong underwear? 2.) Does this woman know how to put on underwear? but, 3.) Is there any chance this really could be a logical lawsuit?

When someone files a products liability lawsuit, the claim is that the product is defective in some way. There are three ways a product can be defective either in its design, how it was manufactured or the way the product was marketed. So where does our defective thong fit in? Most likely it is a combination of the way it was manufactured or its design. However, most people are probably wondering about the plaintiff in this case. Doesn’t everyone know how to put on underwear? Why should Victoria’s Secret have any liability if this lady has her own underwear issues? 

Here is a key page from The Smoking Gun, which shows the actual complaint that was filed. 

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0617081secrets4.html

As part of a products liability claim, you will note the plaintiff has to state that the product was “defective” when it left the control of each defendant. The defendants can include the manufacturer, the supplier — anyone in the ”chain of command” the product followed. As for being “defective”, the focus is to show the product does not meet the safety standards expected by the public. Further, if you can show that the defective nature of the product is something that the defendant(s) could have foreseen, despite how the injury actually happened (ie: user error), the manufacturer could still be held liable.  The tricky part about this claim for a defendant is that products liability claims can be considered “strict liability” torts. So, if the product is found defective, the defendant could be liable, period. Regardless of how the plaintiff uses the product. Seems kind of strange doesn’t it. 

Is it defective if a piece of metal pops off your underwear and hits you in the eye?  Again, the issue is strict liability. If it ends up being that the alleged thong was defective, it won’t really matter whether the plaintiff needs some lessons in putting on underwear. Thus is the life of a products liability claim.

I’m sure when everyone hears about this lawsuit, they will roll their eyes as that is what I did. I get it — damaging your cornea probably isn’t fun. But, a lawsuit?    


Sexual harassment and its different shapes

Sexual Harassment is addressed in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  According to the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments and also applies to employment agencies and to labor organizations, as well as to the federal government.

http://www.eeoc.gov/types/sexual_harassment.html.

The EEOC defines Sexual Harassment as: Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when this conduct explicitly or implicitly affects an individual’s employment, unreasonably interferes with an individual’s work performance, or creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment.

The question is how much is too much and when should you take legal action? Clearly men and women co-exist in the workplace and it is difficult to tell sometimes when a joke, advance, or comment is taken too far. We now have issues where there are same-sex advances as well. I have heard stories where a female assistant was making unwanted advances on another female assistant. (Yes, I know for some men the thought of that is exciting and certainly has nothing to do with harassment).  One of the assistants ended up leaving for other reasons but the situation was still uncomfortable. However, because it was a “same-sex” situation, it seemed as if everyone thought it was “funny” rather than paying attention to what the person might have been going through.

The other shape of harassment though is when both people are attracted to each other. In one quick snap, comments that normally would be seen as “harassment” are actually welcomed and encouraged by the two people involved. There is such a fine line between harassment and a scenario where both people willingly engage in some type of flirtatious dynamic. I am all for some good natured flirting but you are better off keeping it out of the workplace. You never know when the situation could turn against you.

Sometimes people are reluctant to report any type of harassing activity, especially when other claims might be made. A situation was presented where a homosexual male was making unwanted advances to a heterosexual male. The comment was made that the reason why the heterosexual male didn’t like the advances being made was because he was homophobic. Typically that issue does not arise if there are unwanted comments being made by a male to a female or a female to a male.  In that type of scenario, one person might be fearful to bring up the harassing behavior because they do not want to be accused of being discriminatory toward someone else.  

I am definitely interested in hearing what types of situations people encounter in the workplace as there is certainly a tipping point as to when you have an actual sexual harassment claim. Sexual tension can exist in any scenario but sexual harassment is a serious issue. It is definitely the worst feeling to work somewhere where you feel like you never know when the next comment will be made. Always know you can talk to your human resources department as a starting place before escalating the situation into a full blown lawsuit.

 

 

 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.