Tag Archives: Stephanie Cohen

Advice and Jobs

The Not So Legal Show – what happens when you hit a biker and should honest recovering drug addicts still get hired for a job?

 


Some thoughts on Casey Anthony

Should have been found guilty….


Nothing like a Weiner Scandal and the Mavericks Winning

I recorded this right before the Mavericks won but here is the Dallas Mavericks edition of The Not So Legal Show!


Greed and more cheerleading

Attorneys are not always the greedy ones…or do you disagree?


The Gold Rush Club and other body parts

Getting too drunk to be obligated to pay your bar tab is not a good excuse…


Winning takes on a new meaning thanks to Charlie…

I am curious when it will be made known that Charlie Sheen is doing a “Joaquin Phoenix”…


Super Bowl Edition

After I filmed this video, a lawsuit (as expected) was filed regarding one of the topics I talk about…hope everyone enjoyed the Super Bowl though!

 


Californication and other thoughts

Who watches this show? I like it. Hank Moody. Hard to hate him but not so easy to love him — but kind of.  If you haven’t been watching the show, I would advise to stop reading here or if you are concerned that I am giving away some big storyline, I suppose you should stop reading here as well. However, for those of you continuing on, let’s explore the fact that the main character of this show was charged with statutory rape in one episode and shortly thereafter, is working on a new screenplay.  I don’t think most statutory rape cases are dropped this easily but I suppose no one really wants to watch this show with Hank in jail for the remaining episodes. Certainly not me. Just funny how certain shows make you really think “this only happens on TV” in such an obvious way.

Speaking of TV, did anyone see Mark Zuckerberg on Saturday Night Live. Brilliant move on his part. Given that Social Network will probably win an Oscar, better for Mark to go with the flow than against it. I still think the music in Social Network is what made the movie so amazing.

Happy Sunday night to all, it’s going to be a great week ahead.


2011 and the 4th Amendment

Happy 2011 everyone.  I am not one for resolutions as why not take the year to be mindful of every action than deciding on one random day to take a few different paths that basically expire as of January 10th?  In any event, let’s take a look at the 4th amendment. Why, I don’t know but it’s always nice to take a look back at the Constitution at the beginning of the year. Also, I must mention that I am not sad Brett Favre is getting sued for sexual harassment (and I just read his sister got arrested – WTF!). I am so glad the guy is getting called out. I digress. Back to the 4th amendment.

In case you have forgotten,  the 4th amendment states “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

So, what happens if you are sitting at home, doing something illegal of sorts and the police bust down your door? Would you be arrested? In Kentucky, Hollis King and his friends were doing just that when it just so happened that the police were chasing another criminal and mistakenly busted down Hollis’ door.  He and his friends were arrested but the Kentucky Supreme Court threw out the evidence against King ruling that the police did not have cause to bust into his house without a warrant. Was justice served? It isn’t as if King wasn’t doing anything wrong BUT, if the police wanted to bust down his door, they should have followed proper procedure. While I am all for punishment if you are doing something illegal, there is something to be said for freedom from the police just busting in your door at any point.

Or consider the case against Gregory Diaz, whose smartphone was accessed without a warrant when he was arrested on a drug charge in California.  Are any incriminating texts and emails admissible as evidence against him?  According to the Supreme Court, apparently so.  How about if they find evidence of another other crime – such as murder or tax evasion?  Sounds like we should all leave our wallets, phones and purses at home if we have anything to hide from Big Brother.

And for those of you who feel violated by the newly more molesting eyes of TSA, there’s line of underwear that’s got your back, I mean, ass.  Supposedly it protects your personal areas from prying eyes by emblazoning the 4th amendment in metallic ink across key areas.  Anyone interested in metallic pasties?  Going once, going twice…

Lastly, let’s examine the constitutionality of strip searching a 13-year-old girl due to allegations from one of her peers that she sold them drugs, which were later determined to be Ibuprofen.  The Ninth Circuit Court upheld the legality of the search, citing the existence of sufficient case law which supports the reliability of student informants.  Really? Reliable 13 year old student informants? Hmmm.
Overall I think we can feel safe about the 4th amendment in this new year of 2011 but I am going to be watching out for cases that deal with these topics and will keep you posted!

Spam – Jail or No Jail?

If you have an email address, I am sure you have seen an email that goes something like this:

NATIONALE POSTCODE LOTERIJ
WEBSITE:www.postcodeloterij.nl
VAN EEGHENSTRAAT 77 1071 GK
AMSTERDAM.

ONLINE RESULTS:FOR FIRST CATEGORY
DRAW DATE:DECEMBER 2010
PRIZE NUMBER:NPCL/67/89/82/28
AMOUNT WON: ONE MILLION EURO(1,000,000 EURO)

RE: ONLINE EMAIL AWARD NOTIFICATION

YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS HAS WON A PRIZE MONEY OF ONE MILLION EURO AWARDED TO
YOU BY THE NATIONAL POSTCODE
LOTERIJ.TO FILE FOR YOUR CLAIMS SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATIONS FOR
DOCUMENTATION OF CLAIMS.

*FULL NAMES *ADDRESS *NATIONALITY *COUNTRY *TELEPHONE/MOBILE *AGE *SEX
*MARITAL STATUS & OCCUPATION.

PAYMENT OPTION: TICK AN OPTION WHICH SUITS YOU BEST FOR THE REMITTANCE OF
YOUR PRIZE MONEY TO YOU.

1. COURIER DELIVERY OF CERTIFIED WINNING CHEQUE (.....)
2. ONLINE BANK TRANSFER OF PRIZE MONEY          (.....)

CONTACT YOUR FILE AGENT WITH REQUIRED DETAILS

Or, something like this:

Try it!

www.euxicur.com

Doesn’t everyone just love these emails? In Milwaukee, they are prosecuting a man for sending out spam mail. Prosecutors contend that on any given day, one out of three “unwanted emails in the world” originated from this particular person. Fascinating I think to hold the title of  “I am the person that sends out emails that nobody wants”.  If convicted, he faces a $250,000 fine and up to three years in jail. Strong enough punishment? You tell me.

 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.